|
| |
Process transition for a large networking company
Client Profile
The client is a leader in the enterprise networking technology space.
Campaign Requirement
- Evaluating and migrating processes from the client to Nirvana.
- The complexity and lack of documentation about the processes and the supporting technology infrastructure made transition difficult.
- Lack of performance benchmarks resulted in the absence of data for comparison of the ‘before’ and ‘after’ situation.
- The challenge lay in documenting the “in-person” knowledge of the processes and technology and leverages this to set up and manage the off-shored process.
- A standard performance measurement system and benchmarks for critical parameters had to be defined to be able to evaluate the performance of the process.
Nirvana Solution
- Using its proprietary ValID™ toolkit, Nirvana conducted a detailed feasibility exercise to evaluate the costs vis-à-vis the benefits.
- The process transition was undertaken using Nirvana’s proprietary transition toolkit. The Transition Toolkit is a detailed, template driven, step-by-step approach which enables Nirvana to replicate the client process onshore in exactly the same manner as it is done onsite with minimum disruption in the operational process.
- The transition spanning 8 weeks, involved moving 30 FTE’s for a complex high-end technology support process, executed by a dedicated transition team of 2 FTE’s through a mix of onsite and offsite activities. The 8 weeks of transition was split as 1 week of planning, 3 weeks for resourcing for Design Verification, 1 week for Design Verification and 3 weeks for the Ramp Up from ‘Design Verification’ to the ’Business As Usual’ (BAU)
- A transition manager led this overall transition process and project management from Nirvana side. The transition involved a mix of onsite (client side) and offsite (Nirvana side) activities. Nirvana has a dedicated team of consultants in the ‘visa ready’ state who can be deployed onsite at short notice.
- A detailed transition plan was defined and client commitment taken. The plan detailed the activities/ sub activities for transition, associated timelines, resources (client/ Nirvana), dependents, etc.
- A member of the transition team was deployed onsite to aid the client change management process and drive the transition related onsite activities like collating process information and developing detailed level 2/ 3 process and technology maps for the ‘As Is’ and ‘To Be’ Scenario, process performance benchmarks, and FTE analysis. The onsite transition resource also aided interface activities from the client side.
- Another member of the transition team was based offsite to drive the offsite transition activities like process set up, resource deployment (recruitment, training, setting up quality, MIS & reporting procedures, technology, FMEA & Risk Mitigation measures).
- The offsite and onsite transition resources worked in close coordination to ensure activity and deliverable timelines were met. Proactive identification & tracking of critical activities (onsite & offsite) ensured a seamless transition. For the process, recruitment of specialized resources within the defined timeline was a challenge. The team ensured that this was handled by a combination of methods like deploying additional resources for recruitment, tapping unconventional areas of similar talent pool.
- A weeks’ pilot for the design verification stage flowing into the ramp up and BAU mode.
Results
- The process was successfully transitioned and into BAU (Business As Usual) within the defined timeline of 8 weeks.
- Tollgates with deliverables met at various stages.
- Detailed process documented moving from a person centric to a process centric scenario.
- Process and technology documentation aided in training and performance improvement initiatives.
- Actual people and process performance compared against benchmarks and improvement initiatives identified on a continuous basis.
|
|
|